Rhetorical Pitfalls of Careless “Abuse” Reportage (40 Years’ Worth)

TALKING BACK to restraining orders

To beg the question, a phrase whose semantic decay journalists are as culpable for as anyone, means to avoid the question. It means to assume, and assumption is reportorial sacrilege.


  • Allegations “facts”;
  • An accuser a “victim”;
  • Repeated allegations of abuse or violence a “history of abuse” or a “history of violence”;
  • A spike in allegations of violence an “escalation of violence”; and
  • Rampant allegations of violence an “epidemic of violence.”

Decades of complacency by society’s watchdogs have permitted the rise of a system of laws in which, for example, what is called “violence” may be nonviolent. With their cooperation, if not their blessing, language itself has been jettisoned down the rabbit hole. To point a finger today is ipso facto to be nominated a “victim,” requiring that victims be relabeled “survivors,” a word formerly suitable to constructions like these only: “Holocaust survivor,”…

View original post 51 more words

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s